Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 23-15167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, MD., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, MD and others
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 22-16116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, M.D. and others
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 22-15050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH CHUDY, M.D., THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D. and others
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 21-16110
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director of CDCR, A. TRAQUINA, M.D., CMO, NORMA ACQUVA, M.D., HCM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. D. Runnels, et al
as 21-15888
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. P. CHEN, MD at CSP-SOL, BINOYE NAKU, L. B. BROWN, Jr., MD at CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Scott Ballering v. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, et al
as 21-15314
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN LIPPINCOTT, TAKESHI OGASAWARA, PERRY M. TRAQUINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT LYNN BALLERING
Ballering v. Morgan Stanley LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05082
Defendant:
Nobuyuki Hirano, Jami Miscik, PHH Mortgage and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Lynn Ballering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Ballering v. Morgan Stanley LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02164
Defendant:
Nobuyuki Hirano, Jami Miscik, Thomas H. Glocer and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Lynn Ballering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
