Cases 61 - 70 of 125
Jauregui v. Weiner et al
as 2:2009cv03329
Defendant:
Jerry W. Weiner, Doctor's Hospital of Manteca, A. Traquina and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Robles Jauregui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Cate et al
as 2:2009cv03276
Plaintiff:
Richard Manuel Burgos
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, Janet Mohle Boetani, Gary Swarthout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rallos et al
as 2:2009cv03234
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jackson
Defendant:
Tesie R. Rallos, Alvaro Traquina, Jason Rohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rallos et al
as 2:2009at01872
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jackson
Defendant:
Tesie R. Rallos, Alvaro Traquina, Jason Rohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
Michael Smith v. Paul Fortaleza et al
as 2:2008cv06321
Defendant:
M.D. Haniffa Cassim, M.D. Haniffa Cassim, M.D. Yuen Pao Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Coley v. Casin, et al
as 09-17114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW CALVIN COLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CASIN, Doctor, Lancaster State Prison and TRAQUINA, Doctor, Solano State Prison
Williams v. Haviland et al
as 2:2009cv02665
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Williams
Defendant:
J. W. Haviland, Alvaro C. Traquina, Ann Sumner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huntley v. Chen et al
as 2:2009cv02579
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Huntley
Defendant:
Yuen Chen and Alvaro C. Traquina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huntley v. Chen et al
as 4:2009cv04003
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Huntley
Defendant:
Yuen M. Chen and Alvaro C. Traquina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew v. Lahey et al
as 2:2009cv02415
Petitioner:
Joseph B. Matthew
Defendant:
Lahey, Ambrick Basi, Tan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
