Cases 41 - 50 of 19,324
David Little v. City of Saginaw, MI, et al
as 24-1335
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM LITTLE
Defendant:
CITY OF SAGINAW, MI, JORDAN LADOUCE, Police Officer and STEVEN LAUTNER, Police Officer
In re: William Petrey
as 24-5370
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM ROYAL PETREY
Respondent:
KEVIN MAZZA, Warden
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11027
Plaintiff:
William Baldwin
Defendant:
Sam's Club East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Ross v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
William Ross
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wallace et al. v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft, et al
as 5:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
William Wallace, Matt Montross and Benjamin Roberts
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hailey v. Logan County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William T. Hailey
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center, Chief Trimmer and Capt. Timothy Burchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01831
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01816
Plaintiff:
Alisa K Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
