Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Frazer v. Mullins, RN et al
as 5:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
P Mullins, RN, Amanda Miller, Crystal Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Cabinet Health & family Services.
as 1:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Shally Ann Yates
Defendant:
Cabinet Health & family Services.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yates v. CorrectCare-Integrated Health, LLC
as 5:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Marlena Yates
Defendant:
CorrectCare-Integrated Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Kilburn v. Worthington et al
as 0:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Kilburn
Defendant:
Mike Worthington, Amanda Clark, Charles Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Yates v. Becton, Dickinson and Company
as 3:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Bryan Yates
Defendant:
Becton, Dickinson and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Yates v. Royal Consumer Products, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Douglas Yates
Defendant:
Royal Consumer Products, LLC and Steven Schulman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
Yates et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Carter Yates, Estill Lowe, Marty Little and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yates v. Sims et al
as 1:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Adam N. Yates
Defendant:
Johnathon M. Sims and Lynn Logistics, LLC
Intervenor:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yates v. Hill et al
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Allen C. Yates
Defendant:
Bryan Hill and Scott McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Churchill v. Nowicki et al
as 3:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Colletta Brown, Tom Parmenter, Maggie Elder and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Churchill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
