Cases 1 - 10 of 2,033
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DUBOIS COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
JASON KEITH BROWN
Defendant:
DUBOIS COUNTY, SHERRIFF, JAIL COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Marion Superior Court et al
as 3:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Heidi Davonnne Brown
Defendant:
Marion Superior Court and Indiana Department of Child Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL D/B/A BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE WOODBRIDGE CARE CENTER ET AL
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Carol Brown
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL doing business as BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE WOODBRIDGE CARE CENTER, BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE, INC. and GGNSC EVANSVILLE WOODBRIDGE LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Conley et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Tonya Conley, Donny Betzner and Richard Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
