Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
William Bailey
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Thomas v. Bailey et al
as 3:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Thomas
Defendant:
Brandon Bailey and A1 Porta Potty LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Bailey v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
James Bailey
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wiley v. Green, et al
as 0:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Allen Wiley II and Allen Wiley, III
Defendant:
David Green, Nicholas Cleverger, Tyler Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Henderson (Lt)
as 5:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamont Bailey
Defendant:
Dustin Henderson (Lt)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Henderson (Lt)
as 0:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamont Bailey
Defendant:
Dustin Henderson (Lt)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. United States Probation Office et al
as 5:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
James R Bailey, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Probation Office and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Couch v. White et al
as 6:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Joseph White, Henrietta Bailey-Lewis, Allen B. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
