Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jones v. Ball et al
as 7:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Antwoine McKinley Jones
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Ball, Nurse Rose and RNCA Bucklen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marvin Gomez v. L. Fields
as 23-6305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARVIN EDUARDO LUNA GOMEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
L. FIELDS, Unit Manager, J. WEBB, Grievance Coordinator and A. BUCKLEN, RNCA
Defendant:
KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, A. DAVID ROBINSON, STEVE HERRICK and others
Jones v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Antwoine McKinley Jones
Defendant:
Warden Hamilton, A. W. McCoy, Major Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karsten Allen v. Larry Fields
as 22-6473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARSTEN OBED ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY FIELDS, Unit Manager at KMCC, M. G. DESKINS, Lieutenant at KMCC, M. S. BUCKLEN, Lieutenant at KMCC and others
Allen v. Fields et al
as 7:2021cv00244
Defendant:
T. Lowe, Carl Manis, A.T. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Brown et al
as 7:2020cv00600
Defendant:
Stacy Y. Brown, T. Doe Blankenship, Kenneth A. Goldman and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hiawatha Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yahweh v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh, Robert Gabriel Love, Gabriel Alexander Antonio and others
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Carl K. Kester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venable v. Bucklen
as 7:2019cv00606
Defendant:
A. Bucklen
Plaintiff:
Julian H. Venable, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venable v. Bucklen
as 1:2019cv01130
Defendant:
A. Bucklen
Plaintiff:
Julian H. Venable, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yahweh v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv01076
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Dr. Woodrow A. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
