Cases 41 - 50 of 3,017
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Grossman #621120 v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Shawn Paul Grossman #621120
Defendant:
P. C. Allen, Unknown Dill, Unknown Hummel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Curtis et al
as 2:2023cv12857
Plaintiff:
Sharon Curtis
Defendant:
Janette Curtis, Ocwen Loan Servicing, L. L. C., PHH Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Beasley v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2023cv12802
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Beasley
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stampone #713769 v. Michigan Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stampone #713769
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Julie Clement, Michigan Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Sass et al
as 2:2023cv12741
Plaintiff:
Eric Martin
Defendant:
Ryan Sass, Robert Herrst, Mike LNU and others
Thomas #802563 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Lonnie C. Thomas #802563, Leshawn K. Glover #504007, James Kitchen #751036 and others
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, J. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. 36th District Court et al
as 2:2023cv12709
Plaintiff:
Samuel Maurice Dixon, II
Defendant:
36th District Court and Lydia Nance C. Adams
Williams et al v. Gold et al
as 2:2023cv12690
Plaintiff:
Edward S. Williams and Camile V. Williams
Defendant:
Stuart A. Gold, Elias T. Majoros, Jason P. Smalarz and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
