Cases 71 - 80 of 3,025
Fulkerson v. 52nd District Court of Michigan
as 2:2023cv12267
Plaintiff:
David Robert Fulkerson
Defendant:
52nd District Court of Michigan, Nancy Tolwin Carniak, Robert C Davis and others
Bolden #835167 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolden #835167
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muthana et al v. DeAngelo et al
as 2:2023cv12255
Plaintiff:
Ali Musaid Muthana, Mikel Smith, Joshua Paradien and others
Defendant:
Jodi L DeAngelo, Zarie Phillips, J. Gonzalez and others
Kelsey #280530 v. Morrison
as 1:2023cv00914
Petitioner:
John C. Kelsey #280530, II
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. Baraga, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jones, Linda Jones and Brenda Steve
Defendant:
Baraga, County of, Jill C. Tollefson and Anne T. Koski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mancini et al v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv12088
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Mancini, Daniel C. Mancini and Ric-Man Construction Florida, Inc.
Defendant:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Schinella v. Iron, County of
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jane C Schinella and Jane C. Schinella
Defendant:
County of Iron and Iron, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Duff #870201 v. Laponsie et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
James Duff #870201
Defendant:
C. Laponsie, D. Plum, T. Corey-Spiker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Williams
as 2:2023cv11970
Plaintiff:
Michelle Woods
Defendant:
Frederick C. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
