Cases 1 - 10 of 1,311
Willis v. Ruff et al
as 5:2024ct03102
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, City Of Fayetteville, Sgt. James Yowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Everette C. Armstrong
Defendant:
United States of America
Shelton v. Russ et al
as 5:2024ct03085
Plaintiff:
Andre C. Shelton
Defendant:
Nicholas A. Russ, Dare County Detention Center, Marshall H. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Icker v. Grimaldo et al
as 5:2024ct03086
Plaintiff:
Mark Eric Icker
Defendant:
G. Grimaldo, C. Newsom, Mr. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Avens v. Dixon et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cynthia B. Avens
Defendant:
Faris C. Dixon, Jr., Vidant/ECU Health Medical Center, Dr. Karen Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davidson v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03070
Plaintiff:
Dondell C. Davidson
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DeBold v. Stocks et al
as 5:2024ct03054
Plaintiff:
Antoine A. DeBold
Defendant:
Sergeant Stocks, C/O Williams, C/O Everrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharpe v. Bircher
as 7:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Sharpe
Defendant:
John C. Bircher, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Callari v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Benjamin C. Callari
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hartley v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023hc02280
Petitioner:
Drew C. Hartley
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Sheriff of Onslow County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
