Cases 1 - 10 of 31
TURNER v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2021cv01727
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
TURNER v. PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00914
Defendant:
PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and DR. ING. H.C.F. PORSCHE AG
Plaintiff:
BRUCE C. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. PRATT et al
as 3:2020cv10269
Defendant:
SHEREEF M. ELNAHAL, C. WILLAIMS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. BOYLE et al
as 2:2012cv07224
Plaintiff:
HAROLD C. TURNER
Defendant:
TIMOTHY BOYLE, MICHAEL J. FALLON, DENNIS O'CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swords v. Mulva et al
as 1:2011cv01250
Plaintiff:
Patricia Swords
Defendant:
James J. Mulva, Kenneth M. Duberstein, Ruth R. Harkin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Freedman v. Mulva et al
as 1:2011cv00686
Plaintiff:
Robert Freedman
Defendant:
James J. Mulva , Kenneth M. Duberstein , Ruth R. Harkin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
TURNER v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65879
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. TURNER
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICOLETTI v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC et al
as 2:2010cv83471
Plaintiff:
CAROL NICOLETTI
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC, OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. SCHERING-PLOUGH et al
as 2:2010cv03524
Plaintiff:
T. C. DAVIS
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH, SCHERING CORPORATION, FRED HASSAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
City of Edinburgh Cncl as Admi v. Schering Plough Corp, et al
as 10-2413
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF EDINBURGH CNCL AS ADMINISTERING AUTH FOR THE LOTHIAN PENSION FUND
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLAN MARAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SCHERING PLOUGH CORP, HANS W. BECHERER, THOMAS J. COLLIGAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
