Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moore et al v. Henderson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2013cv01243
Plaintiff:
Carey "Sammy" Moore and Janice Johnson
Defendant:
Henderson County Sheriff's Department, Henderson County, TN, Brian Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Woodcock v. City of Bowling Green et al
as 1:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Carey Woodcock
Defendant:
City of Bowling Green , Doug Hawkins , Kevin Wiles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Harris v. Hardeman County Sheriff Dept et al
as 1:2013cv01100
Plaintiff:
Martha J Harris
Defendant:
Hardeman County Sheriff Dept, County Jail and Deputies, Doolen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00018
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carey v. Taylor, City of, et al
as 2:2012cv14777
Plaintiff:
Autumn Carey
Defendant:
Lanny Hall , Taylor, City of and Department of Public Works for the City of Taylor
Brackens v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2012cv00280
Plaintiff:
Leon Brackens
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government , Sam Madison , Emily Lettie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Miller v. NaphCare, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00821
Plaintiff:
Carey Miller
Defendant:
NaphCare, Inc., Inice Carpenter, Beverly Bomar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
