Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Chatman v. Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
as 2:2022cv03277
Plaintiff:
Sherri C. Chatman
Defendant:
Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chatman v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Joyce Chatman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02721
Plaintiff:
Brinda Bradley, Deatirce Digman, Brenda A. Woods and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chambers et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv02601
Plaintiff:
Sheena Hill, Wayne Eric Hopper, Patricia L. Chambers and others
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Local 894 Laborers' International Union of North America et al v. Kenny/Obayashi V et al
as 5:2019cv02221
Plaintiff:
Local 894 Laborers' International Union of North America, Carrington Chatman, Andre Dabney and others
Defendant:
Kenny Construction Company, Kenny/Obayashi V and Obayashi Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shoop v. Mohr et al
as 3:2015cv02437
Plaintiff:
Frank Ray Shoop
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Ed Voorhies, David Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shoop v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv02718
Plaintiff:
Frank Ray Shoop
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Ed Voorhies, David Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
