Cases 21 - 30 of 580
ROSE v. MGM GROWTH PROPERTIES et al
as 2:2023cv12323
Plaintiff:
TANESHA CLARK ROSE
Defendant:
MGM GROWTH PROPERTIES, MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL and VICIS Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Clark v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00950
Petitioner:
Rolondo Dewell Clark
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boniface et al v. Barry, County of et al
as 1:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Ernest Boniface, Debra Clark, Ranee Hooper-Bart and others
Defendant:
Barry, County of and Susan VandeCar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Duff #870201 v. Laponsie et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
James Duff #870201
Defendant:
C. Laponsie, D. Plum, T. Corey-Spiker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2023cv11990
Plaintiff:
Karena Clark
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Doing business as BCBSM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clark v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023cv11744
Plaintiff:
David Clark
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jackson #622337 v. Surety et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Andre Jackson #622337
Defendant:
Unknown Surety, Unknown Bensel, A. Hetrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. ADCO Products Inc.
as 2:2023cv11648
Plaintiff:
Antwaine Clarke
Defendant:
ADCO Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
