Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Schaszberger et al v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 13
as 3:2019cv01922
Plaintiff:
Gary Landiak, Kyle Clouse, Colby Conner and others
Defendant:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 13
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CLOUSE et al v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 5:2015cv04817
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLOUSE and MARGARET HARRISON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, JOSE RODRIGUEZ, TINA KAMINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ENGEL v. CLOUSE et al
as 2:2013cv07288
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ENGEL
Defendant:
EDWARD B. CLOUSE, II , JAMES L. GARDNER , ROBERT J. HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CLOUSE v. MONORE COUNTY PRISON EMPLOYEE'S
as 2:2011cv04387
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLOUSE
Defendant:
MONORE COUNTY PRISON EMPLOYEE'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLOUSE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64324
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE ALBERT CLOUSE and SHIRLEY CLOUSE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRENNAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BRENNAN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, OFFICER CLOUSE, OFFICER PANCHICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRENNAN v. PANCHIK et al
as 2:2010cv00806
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BRENNAN
Defendant:
SHAWN PANCHIK and OFC. D. CLOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLOUSE et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66767
Plaintiff:
GERN J. CLOUSE and BERTHA ALLEEN CLOUSE
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ASTEN-HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
