Cases 31 - 40 of 359
Boussum et al v. Washington et al
as 1:2022cv12232
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Boussum, Phillip Berryman, James Wright and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush, Russ Marian and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brown #126854 v. Young et al
as 1:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brown #126854
Defendant:
Coleman Young, Donald Douggain, Wayne, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell et al v. Benton Harbor, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Iesha Mitchell, Kea N. Bennett, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant:
Benton Harbor, City of, Marcus Muhammad, Michael O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Coleman #689555 v. King
as 1:2022cv00466
Petitioner:
David Ramon Coleman #689555
Respondent:
Chris King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman #379771 v. Ringeutte et al
as 2:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Charlie Coleman #379771
Defendant:
Unknown Ringeutte, Unknown Kent and Unknown LaBuff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv10316
Plaintiff:
Eionna Coleman
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. and Marcal Barlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Scott v. Henry Ford Health System et al
as 2:2022cv10306
Plaintiff:
Ricky Scott
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System, WA Foot Memorial Hospital, Azam Basheer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WILLIAMS V THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
as 2:2022cv10296
Defendant:
SHAMILYA WILLIAMS, University of Michigan, University of Michigan Work Connections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
