Cases 41 - 50 of 270
Scott v. Sisolak et al
as 2:2022cv01801
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Scott
Defendant:
Steve F. Sisolak, Barbara K. Cegavske, Aaron D. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hollett v. Hunt et al
as 2:2022cv01794
Plaintiff:
David G. Hollett
Defendant:
Hunt, Reubart and Cooke
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Memorial Hermann
as 22-20566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry D. Ford
Defendant / Appellee:
Memorial Hermann Greater Heights Hospital, Brookhollow Heights Transitional Care Center, Memoral Hermann Hospice and others
FORD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21421
Plaintiff:
RODERICK D FORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gould v. Renbart et al
as 2:2022cv01755
Plaintiff:
Steven Eric Gould
Defendant:
William Renbart, Aaron D. Ford and State of Nevada
Gorman v. Tamaso et al
as 2:2022cv01678
Plaintiff:
Rickey Lee Gorman
Defendant:
Brittany Tamaso, Yolanda King, Aaron D. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benjamin v. Breslou et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Petitioner:
Ronicia Benjamin
Respondent:
Judge Barry L. Breslou, The Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Aaron D. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Lisle v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99009
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN JAMES LISLE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART and AARON D. FORD
(PC) Marcel D. Ford v. Pitts
as 1:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Marcel D. Ford
Defendant:
Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
