Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Peterson v. Berkley County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Ashley Peterson
Defendant:
Berkley County Sheriff's Department, Berkley County Commission, N. Chronister and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
LAGATTA v. THE CITY OF ALIQUIPPA et al
as 2:2020cv00486
Defendant:
MYRON SAINOVICH, ALIQ PD OFFICER DURANGO, MEMBERS OF THE ALIQUIPPA CITY COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. LAGATTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALKER v. CARRILLO et al
as 2:2014cv05477
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. WALKER
Defendant:
M. CARRILLO, D. MCFADDEN, JULIO ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TD BANK, N.A. v. WALKER et al
as 5:2014cv03177
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
WILLIAM D. WALKER , RONALD L. CONSTEIN , ELLEN L. CONSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. WALKER et al
as 5:2014cv03178
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
WILLIAM D. WALKER , EVE E. WALKER , RONALD J. CONSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. WALKER et al
as 2:2014cv03175
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
WILLIAM D. WALKER and EVE E. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02069
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. WALKER, JR.
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WALKER v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93359
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. WALKER and JULIA D. WALKER
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , ALBANY INTERNATIONAL , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WALKER v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv90212
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D WALKER, ROBERT D WALKER, MARY LOU WALKER and others
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
