Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DEEMS v. PHILLIPS et al
as 2:2018cv02035
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DEEMS
Defendant:
PHILLIPS , WILLIAMS and BUCKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
DEEM v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH DEEM
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, JENNIFER MONZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHN DOE v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2013cv05156
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, KORNBERG SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, NEIL D. THEOBALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEAR et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01025
Plaintiff:
DAVE PEAR , HEIDI PEAR , LEONARD MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES , RIDDELL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEEM v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56615
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. DEEM
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SLOAN v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00205
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, HEIDI SROKA, DAWN DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEEM et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2009cv91370
Plaintiff:
RALPH M. DEEM and VIRGINIA DEEM
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, EMPIRE ACE INSULATION, FIBREBOARD CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DEEM v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61977
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DEEM, WILLIAM DEEM, WILLIAM DEEM and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Cramer v. Deem
as 3:2007cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Cramer
Defendant:
Dean Deem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
