Cases 21 - 30 of 490
Hall v. Mulqueen, et al
as 23-1097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE E. MULQUEEN, Justice, DAVID F. CAPELESS, Berkshire County District Attorney and DEBORAH S. CAPELESS, Clerk of Court, Berkshire County
Martinez v. Salisbury
as 23-1023
Petitioner / Appellant:
GERARDO E. MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, Director, Rhode Island Department of Corrections and WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., Interim Director, Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Interested Party:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Mahoney v. US
as 23-1011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Mahoney v. Krueger
as 23-1001
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, MCFP Springfield
Shalders v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 1:2022cv12231
Plaintiff:
Gloria Shalders
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Rebecca Stafford Sykes, Kelvin Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fabrikant v. Karapetian
as 1:2022cv12157
Plaintiff:
Dr. V.I Fabrikant
Defendant:
Dr E Karapetian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahoney v. Krueger
as 22-1964
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, MCFP Springfield
Gross v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Gross
Defendant:
Shawn McCarthy and Dental and Medical Dept.
Not Classified By Court:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. Hanks
as 22-1931
Petitioner / Appellant:
DALE E. HOLLOWAY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HELEN HANKS, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections
Holloway v. Edmark
as 22-1922
Petitioner / Appellant:
DALE E. HOLLOWAY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
