Cases 21 - 30 of 2,860
Engle v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 4:2024cv10461
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Engle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LeFebvre v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Autumn E. LeFebvre
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Kate Vanover v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
KATE E. VANOVER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Dayton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Dayton, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jessica E. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keeley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Shawn E. Keeley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HEFFELFINGER v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
DARLENE E HEFFELFINGER
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chmiel v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Mark E Chmiel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walter Bradshaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-5080
Plaintiff:
WALTER E. BRADSHAW
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cornejo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mary E Cornejo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
