Cases 21 - 30 of 666
Markus v. Thyer et al
as 3:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Gentry Lee Markus
Defendant:
Cindy Thyer, Philip E Ferguson, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Kessel
as 2:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robinson
Defendant:
Doe and E Kessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hoskins v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Walter Hoskins
Defendant:
John P Yates and E Kessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nolan v. Edge
as 2:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Aldridge Nolan
Defendant:
USA, E Kessel and C Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pearson v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Pearson, III
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolgamott v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv04012
Plaintiff:
Chase E Wolgamott
Defendant:
Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Correctional Officer Cameron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolgamott v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Chase E Wolgamott
Defendant:
Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Cameron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila-Robles v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Wesley E Davila-Robles
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Scharnhorst v. Cantrell et al
as 5:2022cv05243
Plaintiff:
John William Scharnhorst, III
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Jay Cantrell, Captain Nolan Ake, Sergeant Carlos Pineda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Baker et al
as 4:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Josinnie E Johnson
Defendant:
Samuel Baker and Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
