Cases 21 - 30 of 675
Dixon v. Joyner et al
as 7:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Defendant:
Hector Joyner, Gary Rose, E. A. Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taken Alive v. USA
as 6:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Ralph E. Taken Alive, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Westmoreland et al
as 5:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Logan R. Westmoreland and Joseph E. Zupancic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Miniard v. LFUCG Division Code Enforcement et al
as 5:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Matt E Miniard
Defendant:
LFUCG Division Code Enforcement, Alex Olszowy, Evan Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Neaves v. Hampton et al
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Constance O Neaves
Defendant:
Tony Hampton, Steve Quire, E. Humphries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glover v. Ackers
as 6:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
Roy E. Glover
Respondent:
Daniel Ackers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Sumner et al
as 6:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Smith
Defendant:
Stephanie Sumner, Lawson and Carrie Cunnagin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
