Cases 21 - 30 of 1,543
The Odle Law Firm LLC et al v. Branch
as 5:2023cv06135
Plaintiff:
The Odle Law Firm LLC and William C Odle
Defendant:
Emily E Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CASE OPENED IN ERROR - CASE OPEN CORRECTLY IN 23-CV-6135
as 5:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
The Odle Law Firm LLC
Defendant:
William C Odle and Emily E Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bootka et al v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Bootka, Anthony J Bootka, Jr. and Christopher E. Bootka
Defendant:
Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Probst v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05079
Plaintiff:
Shyann E. Probst
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gordon v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
William-Elzy E Gordon
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dudley v. U.S. District Clerk of Court et al
as 4:2023cv00671
Plaintiff:
Gene E Dudley
Defendant:
U.S. District Court Clerk, Gloria Woods and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Reese v. The City of Blue Springs Police Department
as 4:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Austin E Reese
Defendant:
The City of Blue Springs Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dudley v. U.S. Marshal Director
as 4:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Gene E Dudley
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 4:2023cv00656
Petitioner:
Shane E Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
