Cases 21 - 30 of 299
Lowell v. Blake et al
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lowell
Defendant:
Chad E. Blake and Amherst, NH, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Verogna v. Johnstone et al
as 1:2021cv01047
Plaintiff:
Sensa Verogna
Defendant:
Andrea Johnstone, Steven J. McAuliffe, Julie E. Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Flick v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01055
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Flick, Sr.
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, et al., Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Governor, NH, State of
as 1:2021cv00610
Plaintiff:
Troy E. Brooks
Defendant:
Governor, NH, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holloway v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner
as 1:2022fp00009
Petitioner:
Dale E. Holloway, Jr.
Respondent:
NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holloway v. Sununu et al
as 1:2021cv00865
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Holloway, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Sununu, NH Attorney General Gordon MacDonald, John J. Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. USA
as 1:2021fp01023
Petitioner:
Chad E. Austin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singletary v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
Myrtice E Singletary and Myrtice E. Singletary
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hypertherm, Inc. v. Wenzhou Ruixia E-Commerce CO., Ltd
as 1:2021cv00607
Plaintiff:
Hypertherm, Inc.
Defendant:
WENZHOU RUIXIA E-COMMERCE CO., LTD d/b/a JACK & DAVE and Wenzhou Ruixia E-Commerce CO., Ltd doing business as Jack & Dave
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Brady v. Howard et al
as 1:2021cv00614
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Brady and Lisa Marie Brady
Defendant:
Mark E. Howard, Gary E. Hicks, James P. Bassett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
