Cases 41 - 50 of 2,463
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Harnocz v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Harnocz
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ford v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc. d/b/a ECU Health Inc., a/k/a Vidant Medical Center, Claudia E. Goettler, Michael R. Bard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pacheco v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Robert Anderson, Shelby Wyatt and Jonathan Call
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
GLENN v. CLAYTON et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant:
GERALD CLAYTON, DOUGLAS R HARRISON, EDWARD HOUGH WILLAFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Morrow v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Maria E. Morrow
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Cobbs v. McMahon ****
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Rodney E. Cobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Edward McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobbs v. McMahon
as 5:2024ct03012
Plaintiff:
Rodney E. Cobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Edward McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
