Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GLOVER v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2021cv01644
Plaintiff:
CARLOW GLOVER and CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MARY ANN SWIFT, P/O/ KEITH QUICK, P/O CPL. W SHIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv05594
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Woods
as 4:2017cv02099
Plaintiff:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kim Eagan Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPEARMAN v. CITY OF PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM, CFCF et al
as 2:2016cv05268
Plaintiff:
MELVIN SPEARMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM, CFCF, RASOL HINTON, C. EAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EAGAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv04174
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN EAGAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gillespie et al v. Dring et al
as 3:2015cv00950
Plaintiff:
Marjorie M. Gillespie , Thomas J. Gillespie, Jr. , Marie Barge and others
Defendant:
Lori Dring and Nancy Asaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
TANGO et al v. AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv05701
Plaintiff:
CAROL TANGO , DEE ANNE EAGAN , NORMAN MURPHY and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, ASHLAND, INC., CHAMPLAIN CABLE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
