Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Konig v. WasteQuip, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03038
Plaintiff:
Petr Konig
Defendant:
Carousel F&B, LLC, Carousel Group Hotels, LLC, Carousel Hotels Development Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quan v. TAB GHA F & B, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv03397
Defendant:
Matthew S. Yoo, TAB GHA F & B, Inc., I.L. Creation of Maryland, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ky C Quan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IES Commercial, Inc. et al v. Manhattan Torcon A Joint Venture et al
as 1:2017cv03630
Plaintiff:
IES Commercial, Inc. and United States f/b/o IES Commercial, Inc.
Defendant:
Manhattan Torcon A Joint Venture , Manhattan Construction Company , Torcon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Gaffney v. Bishop, Jr. et al
as 1:2012cv03168
Petitioner:
Vonte' Avon Gaffney
Respondent:
F. B. Bishop, Jr. and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williamson v. Bishop et al
as 1:2012cv00051
Plaintiff:
Curtis Williamson
Defendant:
F. B. Bishop, Jr. and DeVore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America for the use of F&B Concrete, LLC v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
as 8:2011cv02065
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use of F&B Concrete, LLC
Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Anisimov v. Hospitality Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv02536
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Anisimov
Defendant:
Hospitality Partners, LLC, Carousel F & B, LLC, Michelle Mason Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America et al v. Garcete Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv02232
Plaintiff:
United States of America and F&B Concrete, LLC
Defendant:
Garcete Construction Co., Inc. and Great American Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
