Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Kimner v. Graber et al
as 5:2024cv02912
Defendant:
Danielle J. Forrest, Judge Susan P. Graber, Danielle J. Hunsaker and others
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Kimner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Kendrid v. Umana et al
as 2:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Forrest Kendrid
Defendant:
I. Umana and Biclar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frances Enyart et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Frances Enyart, Gregory Enyart and A. E.
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Angel Alvarado, Andres Zavala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Kendrid v. Pham et al
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Forrest Kendrid
Defendant:
Pham, Velasco-Scott and Ogbleew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christine Forrester v. Mohamad A. Reshad et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Christine Forrester
Defendant:
Mohamad A. Reshad, ArtLab Dentistry Dental Office of Dr. Reshad and Ted Conley
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sivak v. Forrest et al
as 3:2023cv06251
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Danielle J. Forrest and Judge Richard Paez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Gray v. Konrad
as 2:2023cv02526
Plaintiff:
Forrest Gray
Defendant:
Konrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrid v. Bevins et al
as 3:2023cv05018
Plaintiff:
Forrest Kendrid
Defendant:
Nikiah Bevins and Officer Zuniga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loretta Forrest v. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv07972
Plaintiff:
Loretta Forrest
Defendant:
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
