Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Greater New Hamilton Grove Baptist Church v. Hamilton Grove Missionary Baptist Church et al
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Greater New Hamilton Grove Baptist Church
Defendant:
Hamilton Grove Missionary Baptist Church, Fred Scott, Eugene Scott, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Morgan et al v. Sewell et al
as 5:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Casey Morgan and Jimmy Ward
Defendant:
Joseph Logan Sewell, Jr., Sewell Investments, LLC, Logan N. Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Groves v. The City of Pearl, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Rickey Grayson Groves, II
Defendant:
The City of Pearl, Mississippi, Police Chief Dean Scott, Police Officer Ryan D. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Groves v. Miller et al
as 3:2021cv00695
Plaintiff:
Christopher Antonio Groves
Defendant:
Warden James Miller, C.I.D. Lt. Tanya Burks, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
