Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CRAWFORD v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
SEAN CRAWFORD
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, GEORGE ROBERTS, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaffney et al v. QVC INC
as 2:2022mc00010
Petitioner:
Alan Gaffney, Nicole Gaffney and Derek Gaffney
Respondent:
QVC INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Gaffney et al v. QVC INC
as 2:2022cv00488
Petitioner:
Alan Gaffney, Nicole Gaffney and Derek Gaffney
Respondent:
QVC INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
KENNEDY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2021cv04667
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THOMAS W. WOLF, JOSUA D. SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON-EL v. OFFCR. GAFFNEY et al
as 2:2020cv05978
Defendant:
ETC./ ALL, OFFCR. SNYDER, OFFCR. GAFFNEY and others
Plaintiff:
ALI A. HARRISON-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKS SPORTING GOODS, INC. v. GAFFNEY
as 2:2019cv01285
Plaintiff:
DICKS SPORTING GOODS, INC.
Defendant:
PAUL GAFFNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAFFNEY et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20273
Plaintiff:
PAUL G. GAFFNEY and ROSE A. GAFFNEY
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP, MERCK & CO INC and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NIEDRIST v. BRISTOL TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2019cv01278
Defendant:
BRIAN HYAMS, NICHOLAS PHILLIPPE, MICHAEL SARCEWICZ and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID NIEDRIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAFFNEY v. XOLO TACOS 2, INC.
as 2:2019cv00711
Defendant:
XOLO TACOS 2, INC.
Plaintiff:
MIKAYLA GAFFNEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
