Cases 31 - 40 of 666
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Garcia v. Bexar Co. TX et al
as 5:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Louie Garcia
Defendant:
Bexar Co. TX, Javier Salazar, Ferman Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VORTEX Repertory Company et al v. Colmenero et al
as 1:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
VORTEX Repertory Company, Brock England, Mark Ivy and others
Defendant:
Angela Colmenero, Delia Garza, Kim Ogg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Evans v. Garza
as 23-50541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michelle Evans
Defendant / Appellee:
Jose Garza, in his official capacity as Travis County District Attorney
Lupis v. City of Texas City
as 23-40445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nikola Lupis
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Texas City, City of Texas City Police Department, Joe Stanton, Individually and others
Barnett v. Chacon et al
as 1:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Barnett
Defendant:
Joseph Chacon, Delia Garza, Andy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza v. Dof et al
as 1:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Garza
Defendant:
Hector Dof and Reginal Orageoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Garza
as 1:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Michelle Evans
Defendant:
Jose Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzales et al v. Hile et al
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Gonzales and Michele Renee Gonzales
Defendant:
Larissa M. Hile, Jenna Seeney, William Longlois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Escorza et al
as 5:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
V. Escorza, K. Garza and Alamo Heights Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
