Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Phillips, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-4067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MERLIN SCOTT PHILLIPS, VICKIE PARKS, S&V PHILLIPS DEVELOPMENT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SCOTT SPELLMON, JAMES HANDURA and others
Gipson v. Gooch et al
as 1:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Stacy L. Gipson
Defendant:
Connor Gooch, Luis Hernandez, Kyle Okamura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gipson et al v. Mahon
as 5:2021cv01109
Plaintiff:
Dylan Gipson, Megan Kelly, M.J.G. and others
Defendant:
Christopher J Mahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gipson v. Lakewood Police Dept.
as 1:2021cv02956
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lynn Gipson
Defendant:
Lakewood Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols et al v. Gipson et al
as 5:2021cv00779
Plaintiff:
Hannah Nichols, AN and GN
Defendant:
Jonath Gipson and Loadtex Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherman-Harris-Golson v. Forest Park Police Department et al
as 5:2021cv00466
Defendant:
Thomas Gipson, Joseph Milton, Tyra Nash-Richmond and others
Plaintiff:
Tasha Sherman-Harris-Golson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Strange v. Gipson et al
as 5:2017cv00472
Plaintiff:
Robert Joe Strange
Defendant:
Darren Gipson and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. McCollum, et al
as 17-6064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS D. WOODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY MCCOLLUM, in individual capacity, BRUCE BORNHIEM, in individual capacity, JOE ALLBAUGH, in his official and individual capacities and others
Gipson v. Bristol-Myers Squibb et al
as 5:2017cv00223
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gipson
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
