Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gipson v. Office of Appellate Operations
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Sha'Lace Reane' Nicole Gipson
Defendant:
Office of Appellate Operations
Not Classified By Court:
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Gipson v. Augusta Arthritis Center et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Sha'Lace Reane Nicole Gipson
Defendant:
Augusta Arthritis Center, Dr. Renee Peterkin-McCalman, Emory University Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. MICKENS et al
as 5:2019cv00016
Defendant:
CARTER, DEPUTY WARDEN MELVIN BUTTS, OFFICER VICTRUM and others
Plaintiff:
CASANDRA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Union Local 142 UAW et al
as 1:2018cv00870
Plaintiff:
Darryl E. Bryant
Defendant:
Union Local 142 UAW, Gloria Gipson, Shawn Milligan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Gipson v. Fountain et al
as 1:2017cv03061
Plaintiff:
De'Onte Gipson
Defendant:
Roderick Fountain and OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daker v. Jackson et al
as 1:2017cv00366
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson, A. Fraley, Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham et al v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv00533
Defendant:
Fulton County, Georgia, John H. Eaves, Liz Hausmann and others
Plaintiff:
Cunningham, Tracey Cunningham, Adriana Christopher and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
MCKISSICK v. DEAL et al
as 5:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
RODERICK MCKISSICK
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Jackson et al
as 1:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson, A. Fraley, Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
