Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McFarland v. Cobb County Government et al
as 1:2022cv03494
Plaintiff:
Chance McFarland and Catherine
Defendant:
Cobb County Government, State of Georgia Government, Cobb County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Poole et al
as 1:2021cv03728
Plaintiff:
Frederick Woodard
Defendant:
Judge Gregory Poole, Dallas Cox and Flynn D. Broady, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2018cv02171
Plaintiff:
Torrey Coleman
Defendant:
Cobb County, Cobb County Sheriff Department, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Keaton et al
as 1:2016cv03745
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Rebecca Keaton, Jay E. Stephenson, Lisa Blalock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Caterpillar Inc. et al
as 7:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jones and John Alan Jones
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc, Caterpillar Inc. and Gregory Poole Equipment Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1560
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00533
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00174
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
IN RE: Construction Supervision Services, Inc.
as 5:2012mc00018
Appellee:
Thomas Concrete of Carolina, Inc. , The John R. McAdams Company, Incorporated , Water Works Supply, Inc. and others
Defendant:
HD Supply Waterworks, Limited Partnership
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
