Cases 1 - 10 of 1,172
Pollock v. San Diego County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Luke Pollock
Defendant:
San Diego County Sheriff's Department, Quality Towing and Recovery, The Hertz Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Epperson v. The Hertz Corporation
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Steven Epperson
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
NILAND v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01617
Plaintiff:
MARY NILAND
Defendant:
THE HERTZ CORPORATION, HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS and HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Rodrigues De Freitas v. The Hertz Corporation
as 24-1713
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ALBERTO RODRIGUES DE FREITAS, as Administrator of the Estate of Isabel Auler (deceased)
Defendant:
THE HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Elizabeth Nelson, et al v. Service Towing, Inc., et al
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH NELSON and ALBERT D. THROWER
Defendant:
SERVICE TOWING, INC., ABLE TOWING, LLC, EDWARD D. HERTZ, President and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
