Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Hester v. RMF Nooter, LLC et al.
as 3:2024cv00519
Defendant:
RMF Nooter, LLC, Nooter Toledo, Cenovus U.S. Corp. doing business as Cenovus Toledo Refinery and others
Plaintiff:
Benford Hester
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Hester v. Davies et al
as 2:2023cv04034
Plaintiff:
Clarence O Hester
Defendant:
Albert E Davies, III, Corey N Alexander, Amy L Busic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester v. Gordon et al
as 1:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Tara B. Hester
Defendant:
Michael L. Gordon and Michael L. Gordon, D.M.D., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hester v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv01996
Plaintiff:
Jody Michelle Hester
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hester v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02722
Plaintiff:
Pattie Sue Hester
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hester v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04373
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leslie Hester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shorter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00959
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hester Shorter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. City of Cleveland, Ohio, et al.
as 1:2019cv02328
Defendant:
Alan Furtado, Stephens, #5531, Timothy Holt, #5715 and others
Plaintiff:
Administrator John R. Harrison and John R. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hester v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03233
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Hester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hester v. City of Ashtabula, Ohio et al
as 1:2018cv01159
Plaintiff:
Brendan Hester
Defendant:
City of Ashtabula, Ohio , Daniel Gillespie and Spencer Gale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
