Cases 1 - 10 of 288
SHANKLE v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 2:2024cv01748
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY and JESSICA HICKS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANKLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks et al v. Duryea Borough Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv02162
Defendant:
Nicholas Lohman, Duryea Borough Police Department, Robin Blake and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Hicks and Ashley Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HICKS v. FABIAN et al
as 2:2024cv01489
Defendant:
PAT FABIAN and WARDEN JESSICA HICKS
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03362
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
SARA HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HICKS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03350
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK A/S and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
GERALD HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Defendant:
Ms. Hicks, State of Pennsylvania, Dr. Laurel R. Harry and others
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Lawrence Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Advocate Health, LLC
as 2:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Derek A. Hicks
Defendant:
Advocate Health, LLC doing business as Advocate Health Advisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
JACOBY JAMES v. HICKS et al
as 2:2024cv01099
Plaintiff:
DURON JACOBY JAMES
Defendant:
NATASHA HICKS, TRANSUNION, EXPERIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Trump
as 1:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Mark Henry Hicks
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Supreme Court
as 1:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
Mark Henry Hicks
Defendant:
Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
