Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 357
Nash v. F C I - Talladega We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff: Paul Nash, Jr
Defendant: Warden F C I - Talladega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: Courtney M. Smith
Defendant: David Jones, David Martinez, Leroy D. Dale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DHIR-Birmingham I LLC v. Harvey
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: DHIR-Birmingham I LLC
Defendant: Lucas Harvey
Curry v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00650
Plaintiff: Dominiqic I. Curry
Defendant: John Q. Hamm and Sheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Butts v. I C Systems Inc
as 2:2023cv01067
Plaintiff: Shannon Butts
Defendant: I C Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thompson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00767
Defendant: 3M Company, Du Pont de Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Derrick Tamar Thompson, William Spangler, Randall Lynn Spaustat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hall v. Dirt Cheap I, LLC (CONSENT)
as 3:2023cv00297
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Hall
Defendant: Dirt Cheap I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Osborne v. PNC Bank et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff: Edward I Osborne
Defendant: PNC Bank, Young Boozer and Tony S Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?