Cases 21 - 30 of 38
BOGGS v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS and J. P. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Davis Group, Inc. v. J & P and Sons Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
The Davis Group, Inc.
Defendant:
J & P and Sons Construction, Inc. and Pittman Concrete & Building Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
WILLIAMS v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
COLTON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, SHAWN EMMONS and J. P. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATES v. J P MORGAN CHASE BANK N A
as 4:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
SHAWNA BATES
Defendant:
J P MORGAN CHASE BANK N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cameron v. J. P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv04104
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Cameron
Defendant:
J. P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp. and Marix Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Comer v. J P Morgan Chase Bank, N A
as 4:2011cv00088
Plaintiff:
MELANIE COMER
Defendant:
J P MORGAN CHASE BANK N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanley et al v. DeKalb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv02031
Plaintiff:
Tressa Stanley
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Georgia , Dekalb County Georgia Police Department , J. P. Brandenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees et al v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04218
Plaintiff:
Mark Dees and Claire Dees
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance LLC and J P Morgan Chase, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
United States of America v. $5,000,793.00 in United States Currency Seized from J. P. Morgan Chase Bank Account X-4964
as 1:2010cv03511
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$5,000,793.00 in United States Currency Seized from J. P. Morgan Chase Bank Account X-4964
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
