Cases 1 - 10 of 2,468
Jackson v. Parkland Memorial Hospital
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Sir Gregory P. Jackson
Defendant:
Parkland Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
PENA et al v. CARDONA et al
as 5:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
JULIO PENA and NANCY PENA
Defendant:
CHIEF ROXANNE CARDONA, OFFICER J ORTIZ, CHAD COVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. The State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
SirGregory P. Jackson
Defendant:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 4:2024cv01675
Plaintiff:
Renee Jackson
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Tameika Jackson
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Moniesha Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JACKSON v. UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE et al
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE, CMC Pharmacy and University Texas Medical Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Collier
as 4:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Director
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Reidie Jackson
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01478
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Byran Collier, Joey Ashton, Trey Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
