Cases 41 - 50 of 333
Ducksworth, Brian v. Massen, T. et al
as 3:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Brian Armon Ducksworth
Defendant:
T. Massen and Jackson Correctional Inst.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Trevon Jackson and Yazmen Pierce
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Nora R Burlo, Hannah Merkel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Jess et al
as 1:2021cv01479
Plaintiff:
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan)
Defendant:
Cathy Jess, Peter Huibregtse, Timothy Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lim, Khor v. Tong, Goh et al
as 3:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Goh Chok Tong, Barack Obama, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Knetzer et al
as 2:2021cv01383
Plaintiff:
Tommy Edward Jackson
Defendant:
Sgt Knetzer, Officer Eickholt, Janelle Kleeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, Goh Chok Tong, President Barack Obama and others
Jackson v. Matushak et al
as 2:2021cv01126
Plaintiff:
Littleton Emmett Jackson
Defendant:
Anthony Matushak, CO Yang, Joshua Gomm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Hepp
as 2:2021cv00994
Petitioner:
Christopher L Jackson
Respondent:
Randall R Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trotter v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv00941
Plaintiff:
Jyrone Jrotter and Tyrone Trotter
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail and K Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. The Catholic Diocese of Jackson et al
as 2:2021cv00876
Plaintiff:
Raphael Love
Defendant:
The Catholic Diocese of Jackson, Franciscan Friars Assumption BVM Province Inc, Paul West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
