Cases 21 - 30 of 257
Webster v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv12848
Plaintiff:
Mark Webster
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Chapman, G. Stephenson and others
Cofer et al v. Financial Education Services et al
as 2:2022cv12759
Plaintiff:
Michelle Cofer, Keedric M Cofer, Cortez Jenkins and others
Defendant:
Financial Education Services dba United Wealth Education, United Wealth Services dba United Wealth Education, Financial Education Services Doing business as United Wealth Education and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Murie v. Northwestern Michigan College et al
as 1:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Clifton Murie
Defendant:
Northwestern Michigan College, NMC Board of Trustees, Jim White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Neeley v. Genesee County et al
as 3:2022cv12415
Plaintiff:
Jodi Neeley
Defendant:
Genesee County, Kandy Jenkins and Matthew Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Vital Care Health Strategies et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Calvin Anderson
Defendant:
Vital Care Health Strategies, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v Social Security
as 2:2022cv10931
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fitzgerald Jenkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Jenkins v. Rapid Mortgage Funding, Inc.
as 2:2022cv10512
Plaintiff:
Zachary Jenkins
Defendant:
Rapid Mortgage Funding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jenkins v. Campbell et al
as 2:2022cv10475
Petitioner:
Van Jenkins
Respondent:
Ulsses W. Boykin and Sherman Campbell
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
