Cases 1 - 10 of 3,258
Berger v. State Of Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
State Of Alabama, FEB Bancshares, Inc., 22nd State Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath et al v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Heath and Anna Holliday
Defendant:
John Doe and U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McCrory v. Hamm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Charles McCrory
Defendant:
John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jamie Mills
Defendant:
John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Bailey et al
as 5:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Heath Berry
Defendant:
William C Bailey, Robert E (Bud) Cramer, Jim Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Stallworth et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jermari Marshall and Twyla Stallworth
Defendant:
John G. Barton and City of Andalusia, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Truist Bank v. McConaghy Drug Store, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank
Defendant:
McConaghy Drug Store, John McConaghy and Dan McConaghy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
