Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Johnson v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Cheyanne Clark, Mark Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rowe et al
as 3:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Terence M Johnson
Defendant:
Rowe, Hester, Muniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Carvaughn Johnson
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Leo Arnone, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Cheney et al
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Brandon Anthony Ramos
Defendant:
Cheney, Cauley, Scagliarini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States Of America
as 3:2023cv01680
Petitioner:
Marvel Johnson
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sakon v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
John Alan Sakon
Defendant:
John Johnson, F Perrone, Bruce D. Skehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Unnamed Respondent
as 3:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Warden and Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Ogrodowicz et al
as 3:2022cv01104
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Johnson
Defendant:
Ogrodowicz, Hauptman, Ewing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
