Cases 21 - 30 of 1,753
Brooks v. Howard et al
as 5:2024ct03063
Plaintiff:
Darius Tremayne Brooks
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Howard, Sgt. Johnson, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Chambers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Larry Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. Post Office et al
as 5:2024ct03052
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office and Michael Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Harnett County Detention Center
as 5:2024ct03046
Plaintiff:
William Kirk Johnson
Defendant:
Harnett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johnson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02034
Petitioner:
Bradley Johnson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Shawn Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JOHNSON v. LAND HOME FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
SANDRA MARIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
LAND HOME FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. doing business as LAND HOME FINANCIAL GROUP doing business as LHFS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
JOHNSON v. WHITSETT
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JERRY W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SERGEANT WHITSETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
