Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Anthony Jermaine Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Michael Joe Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook doing business as Meta doing business as Meta, LLC., Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities Fraud
Ambuski v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Edmund Paul Ambuski, Jr.
Defendant:
Rob Johnson, Tami Roede and Carle Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Indiana, State of et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Indiana, State of, North Dakota, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hendricks v. Jaquith et al
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dustin Hendricks
Defendant:
Shandra Jaquith, Ramsey County, Lake Region Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stanfield v. Puyallup, City of et al
as 3:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Kevin Stanfield
Defendant:
Puyallup, City of, Dean Johnson, Andrea Beall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Hagen
as 1:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. John Hagen, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00126
Petitioner:
Mardale Deshaun Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
