Cases 31 - 40 of 2,966
Luongo v. O'Malley
as 9:2024cv80092
Plaintiff:
Robyn K Luongo
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
K. v. OMALLEY
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Cameron K.
Defendant:
MARTIN OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
K. v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Cameron K.
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Hulse v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03016
Plaintiff:
Sheralyn K. Hulse
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hudock v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Brain K. Hudock
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MELTON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
DONNA K. MELTON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Nelson v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Kimberly K. Nelson and Kimberly Katherine Nelson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Parks v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kimberly K Parks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SMITH v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAMIE K. SMITH
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Jamar K Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
