Cases 11 - 20 of 221
Parker v. Brown
as 2:2023cv00695
Petitioner:
Joel K. Parker
Respondent:
Robert Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Price v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Prince A. Price
Defendant:
Ronnie Thompson, William K. Marshall and Division Corrections Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeland v. Marshall et al
as 3:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Aron Freeland
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, III, Jason Collins and Jason Workman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Harris
Defendant:
W. Holzapfel, K. Heckard and D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
Director Michael Carvajal, Doe 1, K. Craddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crane v. Commissioner D.O.C.
as 3:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Lonnie K. Crane
Defendant:
Commissioner D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crane v. Personnel of Union Supply Direct
as 3:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Lonnie K. Crane
Defendant:
Personnel of Union Supply Direct
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramsey v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00567
Petitioner:
Tavaris K. Ramsey
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Taylor v. Wexford Health Sources, Incorporated, et al
as 2:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
Joseph Taylor
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Incorporated, William K. Marshall III and West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Floyd v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00472
Petitioner:
Johnny D. Floyd, Sr.
Respondent:
K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
