Cases 1 - 10 of 16
KEMP et al v. THOMPSON
as 2:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
TOM T. KEMP and RYAN STARR
Defendant:
THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON-BEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKE EL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, UNKNOWN NAMED OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR (A.R.C.), A. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
IVY v. CRAWFORD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
MARCUS EDWARD IVY
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY JAIL, JEFF HOWELL, WAYNE BULLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivy v. Crawford County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Marcus Edward Ivy
Defendant:
Crawford County Jail, Jeff Howell, Wayne Bullington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMPHREY v. HOWELL et al
as 4:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JEFFERY HOWELL, WAYNE BULLINGTON, CYNTHIA KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEMPER v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02377
Plaintiff:
GERALD KEMP and GERALD KEMPER
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, BRANDON MILLER, DEBRA HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEMP v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2021cv01221
Petitioner:
KURT J. KEMP
Respondent:
SEVIER and THEODORE ROKITA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEMP v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2020cv00955
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. KEMP
Respondent:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE-BEY v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2020cv00147
Plaintiff:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY
Defendant:
FREDRICK A. MEDLEY, JAMES W. SHAFFER, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEMP v. GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2019cv02788
Defendant:
M. SEIVER, BRYAN PEARSON, H. WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
KURT J. KEMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
